Identifying Logical Fallacies in Social Media Debate

Hard Critical Analysis Logical Fallacies

In a televised discussion on social media's effect on politics, a commentator asserted, 'If we continue to let social media influence public opinion, we will end up with no informed voters at all.' This claim was met with criticism from another participant who retorted, 'Your argument is flawed; if we stop social media from influencing opinion, voters will become uninformed and ignorant of key issues.' This exchange highlights a vital point in modern discourse: the role of social media in shaping public perception. Both points raise concerns about the implications of social media, but they also reflect faulty reasoning.

Based on this exchange, which statement best identifies the logical fallacy present in the rebuttal made by the second participant?

The second participant commits the straw man fallacy by misrepresenting the first participant's argument.

The second participant employs a slippery slope fallacy suggesting that curbing social media leads to ignorance.

The second participant is guilty of ad hominem by attacking the character of social media users.

The second participant uses an appeal to emotion rather than providing logical reasoning.

Hint

Submitted4.2K

Correct2.2K

% Correct52%