Loading...
LSAT
LSAT Logical Reasoning

Public Transportation and Traffic Congestion Disagreement

Very Hard Point At Issue Identify Disagreement

Professor Sampson argues that increasing funding for public transportation is essential for reducing traffic congestion in urban areas. According to him, better public transport options will encourage more people to use these services instead of driving their private vehicles, which will lead to decreased traffic on the roads.

On the other hand, Emily, a city planner, contends that simply increasing funding for public transportation will not sufficiently decrease traffic congestion, because she believes that the main issue is not the lack of options but the cultural preference for car travel among residents. She insists that without changing the social attitudes toward transportation, even enhanced public transport will fail to attract substantial ridership.

Their disagreement centers on what exactly is the decisive factor influencing traffic congestion in urban areas.

Hint

Submitted4.1K
Correct3.4K
% Correct83%