Loading...
LSAT
LSAT Reading Comprehension

Evaluating the Efficacy of Banning Sugary Drinks in Schools

Very Hard Argument Evaluation Evaluate Reasoning

In a recent editorial, a columnist contended that banning sugary drinks in public schools is an ineffective approach to combating childhood obesity. The columnist argued that rather than prohibiting certain beverages, schools should implement comprehensive nutrition education and promote physical activity among students. The columnist claimed that a focus on education allows children to make informed choices for themselves, thereby fostering lifelong healthy habits. Critics of the columnist's stance countered that education alone will not suffice since children are often influenced by outside factors, such as advertising and peer pressure, which can't be addressed solely through knowledge.

Given this argument, evaluate the reasoning presented by the columnist. Which of the following statements most effectively challenges the columnist's conclusion?

Hint

Submitted8.4K
Correct7.3K
% Correct86%