Example of Judicial Activism

In the context of the United States judicial system, the principle of judicial activism versus judicial restraint is a critical debate. Judicial activism refers to the idea that judges should interpret the Constitution and laws in a way that advances social goals and protects individual rights, often leading to decisions that reflect contemporary values. In contrast, judicial restraint encourages judges to limit their own power by adhering closely to established laws and precedents. Considering this debate, which of the following Supreme Court decisions is most commonly cited as an example of judicial activism?