Evaluating Arguments in Environmental Discussion

Very Easy Synthesis Of Information Evaluating Arguments

In a community meeting about environmental conservation, several residents expressed their views on the importance of reducing plastic waste. One resident, Sarah, presented data showing that plastic pollution affects marine life, while another resident, John, shared a personal story about how plastic waste impacted his favorite beach. Both arguments aim to persuade others to support local policies for reducing plastic usage.

Consider the effectiveness of these arguments. Which of the following statements best evaluates their strengths in persuading the community?

Sarah's argument is stronger because it uses scientific data that quantifies the problem.

John's argument is weaker because it is based solely on personal experience.

Both arguments are equally effective since they appeal to different types of audiences.

Sarah's use of data makes her argument more credible, while John's story can emotionally engage the audience.

John's story is stronger because it is relatable to everyone in the community.

Hint

Submitted5.0K

Correct3.7K

% Correct73%