In the serene village of Eldermere, two scholars, Dr. Rowan and Professor Elm, often engaged in discussions about the role of nature in literature. Dr. Rowan believed that nature serves primarily as a backdrop for human emotion and conflict, while Professor Elm argued that nature itself is a character that influences the actions and decisions of the protagonists. In one of their conversations, Dr. Rowan referenced a novel set in the rugged highlands, depicting a character whose deep despair is exacerbated by the relentless storms and unforgiving landscape. Professor Elm countered with an example from a classic poem, where the nature surrounding the speaker is almost a guiding force, echoing their internal struggles. Both scholars thought their perspectives were valid, but they often overlooked the idea that their interpretations could complement each other.

Considering their arguments, which aspect do both Professor Elm and Dr. Rowan agree is significant in a literary context?