Analyzing Urban Planning Arguments on Sustainability

Very Hard Craft And Structure Analyzing Arguments

Consider the following argument presented in an academic discussion regarding the future of urban development:

'As cities continue to grow, urban planners must prioritize sustainable development over superficial aesthetic improvements. While enhancing the visual appeal of urban spaces can attract tourism and investment, it can lead to significant environmental costs. Advocates for sustainability argue that integrating green infrastructure, such as parks and renewable energy sources, will not only improve the quality of urban life but also mitigate climate change effects. Critics, however, fear that focusing on sustainability may neglect the immediate economic benefits of beautification projects.'
Based on this argument, which of the following statements most accurately captures the author's primary claim?

Urban aesthetic improvements are essential for boosting economic growth in cities.

Sustainable development should be the main focus of urban planning, even at the expense of immediate economic gains.

Balancing economic benefits and environmental costs is crucial in urban planning decisions.

Critics of sustainable development have valid points about the need for aesthetic enhancements.

Hint

Submitted4.6K

Correct3.2K

% Correct70%