Free Exercise Clause Implications in Employer Division v. Smith

Very Hard Unit 3: Civil Liberties & Rights Freedom Of Religion

In the landmark case of Employer Division v. Smith (1990), the Supreme Court addressed a critical question regarding the interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The case involved two Native Americans who were fired from their jobs for using peyote, a hallucinogenic drug, during a religious ceremony. They subsequently sought unemployment benefits, arguing that their dismissal violated their right to free exercise of religion. The Supreme Court's ruling established a significant precedent regarding the limits of religious freedom, particularly in relation to generally applicable laws. Based on this case and its implications, which of the following statements accurately reflects the Supreme Court's decision and its broader context?

The Supreme Court ruled that individuals could not be denied unemployment benefits for violating a law that is neutral and generally applicable to all citizens.

The decision affirmed that religious practices cannot be restricted unless a compelling government interest is at stake.

This ruling resulted in the establishment of a strict scrutiny standard for any law that affects religious practices.

The Court determined that the state must accommodate religious practices even if they conflict with a neutral law.

Hint

Submitted4.0K

Correct3.9K

% Correct98%