In recent years, many cities have implemented bike-sharing programs in an effort to reduce traffic congestion and promote sustainable transportation. Proponents argue that these programs not only decrease the number of cars on the road but also improve air quality and encourage healthier lifestyles among residents.
Critics, however, contend that bike-sharing programs often face issues such as inadequate infrastructure and safety concerns, leading to limited participation and effectiveness. They argue that funding should be redirected towards improving public transportation or road safety measures for cyclists instead.
Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments presented. In your essay, discuss whether the supporting reasons provided by proponents are compelling enough to justify the continuation or expansion of bike-sharing programs. Use specific examples and logical reasoning in your response.
Note: The provided solution includes an example of a perfect-score answer and explanation. Your response will not be scored.