Analyzing Competing Arguments on GMOs

Medium Conflicting Viewpoints Analyzing Arguments

In a recent debate regarding the effectiveness of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture, two perspectives emerged. Advocate A argues that GMOs are essential for increasing crop yields and ensuring food security in a growing global population. They cite studies showing that GMO crops can lead to higher productivity and require fewer pesticides, thus benefiting the environment. Conversely, Advocate B contends that GMOs pose potential health risks and threaten biodiversity. They reference research suggesting that the long-term effects of consuming GMO products are still unknown and raise concerns about the impact on non-target species and soil health.

Based on these viewpoints, which statement best summarizes the conflicting arguments presented in the debate?

Advocate A emphasizes the benefits of GMOs for increasing crop yields, while Advocate B focuses on the environmental risks associated with their use.

Both advocates agree on the importance of GMOs in modern agriculture but differ in their perspectives on health implications.

Advocate A supports the idea that GMOs improve nutritional content, whereas Advocate B argues that traditional farming methods are superior.

Both advocates argue that GMOs are necessary for food production but disagree on regulatory approaches.

Hint

Submitted6.0K

Correct4.4K

% Correct74%