Anti-Federalists' Objections to the Constitution

Very Hard Period 3: 1754–1800 Federalists Vs. Anti-federalists

During the late 18th century, a pivotal debate occurred in the United States regarding the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists supported a strong national government and the proposed Constitution, advocating for a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists were deeply concerned about the potential for centralized power to infringe upon individual liberties and states’ rights, arguing that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens. This ideological divide raised crucial questions about the power dynamics in the new republic and the relationship between the federal and state governments.

Which of the following statements best represents one of the main objections that Anti-Federalists had regarding the Constitution?

The Constitution allows for the direct election of senators, undermining state authority.

The Constitution consolidates too much power in a centralized federal government without adequate limits.

The Constitution was drafted without any public input, suggesting a lack of democratic values.

The Constitution does not include provisions for the recognition of slavery, which is vital for Southern states.

Hint

Submitted21.6K

Correct17.3K

% Correct80%