Argument for Campaign Finance Reform

In recent years, debates about campaign finance reform have intensified, particularly surrounding the impact of money on elections and policy decisions. Critics argue that the current campaign finance system, especially following the Citizens United v. FEC decision in 2010, disproportionately favors wealthy individuals and corporations, undermining the democratic process and contributing to political inequality. Supporters contend that such financial contributions are a form of political speech protected by the First Amendment, fueling robust political discourse and allowing candidates to compete effectively.

Using evidence from the political processes and constitutional principles discussed in your AP United States Government and Politics coursework, argue whether campaign finance reform is essential for maintaining democratic integrity. Your argument should include at least two pieces of evidence from the provided sources or your knowledge of American political institutions, including examples of significant Supreme Court cases or legislation.