In the realm of First Amendment jurisprudence, freedom of speech is not absolute and is subjected to various interpretations and limitations. One significant case involved a protest intended to express opposition to a political figure during a campaign rally, where demonstrators applied expressive conduct that included symbolic gestures perceived as offensive to the audience. The legal question arose regarding whether the government could impose restrictions on this type of expressive conduct under the guise of maintaining public order or protecting societal morals. How would the Supreme Court's interpretation of freedom of speech apply in this context?