The role of money in U.S. elections has sparked significant debate regarding its influence on democracy and political integrity. Major Supreme Court rulings, such as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, have altered the landscape of campaign finance by impacting the way that political contributions are viewed under the First Amendment. These changes have raised questions about the implications for electoral competitiveness and the potential for corruption.
In this context, one pivotal aspect centers on the concept of super PACs, which have emerged following the Citizens United decision, allowing unrestricted contributions from corporations and individuals to influence elections. Understanding the implications of this is essential for analyzing current political dynamics and the regulatory framework of campaign finance.