Comparative Analysis of Ethical Frameworks

Very Hard Comparative Reading Compare Passages

Passage 1 discusses the philosophical concept of utilitarianism, emphasizing that the moral worth of an action is determined by its contributions to overall happiness. The author argues that actions should be evaluated based on their outcomes and that the greatest good for the greatest number should be paramount. However, the passage also acknowledges criticisms of utilitarianism, particularly regarding its potential to justify actions that may be harmful to individuals if they benefit the majority.

Passage 2 presents a contrasting view rooted in deontological ethics, which contends that the morality of an action should be based on whether the action itself is right or wrong, regardless of the consequences. The author asserts that certain moral duties must be upheld, even if violating them could lead to greater overall happiness. This passage also critiques utilitarianism for overlooking the rights of individuals in favor of collective happiness.

Both passages agree that moral evaluations should rely solely on outcomes.

Passage 1 supports utilitarianism, while Passage 2 upholds deontological ethics, emphasizing different bases for moral decisions.

Both passages suggest that individual rights should be prioritized over collective well-being.

Passage 1 criticizes deontological ethics for ignoring outcomes, while Passage 2 does not address this issue.

Both passages propose that utilitarianism is an unassailable moral framework.

Hint

Submitted14.3K

Correct12.4K

% Correct87%