Comparative Analysis of Surveillance Perspectives

Very Hard Synthesis Of Information Comparative Analysis

Read the following excerpts discussing the nature of government surveillance in modern society. Both authors provide their viewpoints on its ethical implications.

Excerpt A: While government surveillance is often justified as a necessary tool for national security, it raises significant ethical questions regarding individual privacy and civil liberties. The balance between safety and freedom appears increasingly tilted towards invasive practices that jeopardize the foundational principles of democracy.

Excerpt B: The rise in government surveillance initiatives can be seen as both a protection against threats and a manifestation of an evolving societal contract. Citizens, in exchange for safety, tacitly consent to monitoring of their activities, which is a reasonable trade-off in an age where terrorism has reshaped our understanding of security.

Based on these excerpts, which option best captures a comparative analysis of the two authors' perspectives?

Both authors agree that government surveillance is a necessary practice, though they differ on its implications for democracy.

Author A emphasizes the detrimental effect of surveillance on civil liberties, while Author B views it as a protective measure.

Both authors focus solely on the historical context of surveillance but diverge on its modern implications.

Author A believes that privacy should remain inviolable, while Author B argues that surveillance is an acceptable compromise for safety.

Both authors discuss the legality of surveillance but offer different interpretations of its moral quandary.

Hint

Submitted4.1K

Correct2.2K

% Correct53%