Comparing Hypotheses on Light Exposure

Very Easy Conflicting Viewpoints Comparing Hypotheses

In a study regarding plant growth, two researchers propose differing hypotheses about the impact of light exposure on growth rates.

Researcher A suggests that plants receive more light, their growth rate will increase significantly due to enhanced photosynthesis.

Researcher B argues that too much light could lead to photoinhibition, which may diminish growth rates despite high light exposure.

Based on these hypotheses, which statement best compares the viewpoints of Researcher A and Researcher B regarding light exposure and plant growth?

Both researchers agree that more light always promotes plant growth.

Researcher A believes light is entirely beneficial, while Researcher B sees the potential for negative effects.

Researcher B supports enhancing light exposure as a universal method for improving growth.

Both researchers believe there is no relationship between light exposure and plant growth.

Submitted7.7K

Correct5.8K

% Correct75%