Comparing Views on Government Regulation in Market

Easy Comparative Reading Compare Passages

Passage 1 discusses the role of government regulation in ensuring fair market practices. It argues that without regulation, monopolies may form, limiting competition and harming consumers. The author provides examples of past monopolies that were dismantled through legislation, highlighting the importance of oversight in maintaining a healthy economy.

Passage 2, on the other hand, critiques the efficacy of governmental regulations in the market. It posits that excessive regulation stifles innovation and entrepreneurship, suggesting that the free market should be allowed to self-regulate as a natural mechanism for improving product quality and availability. The author illustrates this point with case studies of industries that flourished in deregulated environments.

Both passages agree that government intervention is necessary for economic stability.

Both passages suggest that monopolies can negatively impact consumers.

Passage 1 emphasizes regulation while Passage 2 advocates for deregulation.

Both passages focus on the benefits of strict government control over markets.

Passage 1 supports deregulation, while Passage 2 is in favor of more regulations.

Hint

Submitted9.4K

Correct6.3K

% Correct67%