Conflict Between Research on Herbicide X

Very Hard Conflicting Viewpoints Analyzing Arguments

Two research teams, Team A and Team B, conducted separate studies on the impact of a specific herbicide, Herbicide X, on local aquatic ecosystems. Team A claims that Herbicide X significantly harms aquatic life, reducing biodiversity by damaging the reproductive systems of various fish species. This conclusion was drawn from a five-year longitudinal study that monitored fish populations and reproductive health in treated vs. non-treated waters.

Conversely, Team B disputes Team A's findings, asserting that the observed changes in fish populations are primarily due to natural environmental fluctuations and not the use of Herbicide X. They conducted a shorter-term study focusing on water quality parameters and argue that their data indicate that biodiversity remains stable despite the use of the herbicide. Team B suggests that outside factors, such as urban runoff and seasonal changes, are major influencers on aquatic health.

Given these conflicting viewpoints, which of the following statements best summarizes a key difference in the arguments presented by Team A and Team B?

Team A emphasizes the long-term effects of the herbicide, while Team B focuses only on short-term environmental variables.

Team A believes urban runoff significantly contributes to biodiversity loss, whereas Team B finds it negligible.

Team A supports the use of Herbicide X for improved fish breeding, while Team B opposes its application altogether.

Team A's studies rely primarily on laboratory trials, while Team B uses observational field studies.

Hint

Submitted12.0K

Correct5.5K

% Correct46%