Conflicting Hypotheses on Urbanization and Wildlife

Medium Conflicting Viewpoints Comparing Hypotheses

Two ecologists, Dr. White and Dr. Grey, conducted a comparative study on the effects of urbanization on local wildlife populations. Dr. White hypothesizes that urbanization severely disrupts wildlife habitats, leading to declining animal populations and increased competition among species for limited resources. In contrast, Dr. Grey argues that urban areas, if well-planned, can support diverse wildlife populations by providing new food sources and nesting sites.

Based on these hypotheses, which of the following statements best reflects the main focus of their conflicting viewpoints?

Dr. White believes urban areas are detrimental to wildlife, while Dr. Grey thinks they can enhance wildlife opportunities.

Dr. White asserts all urban areas destroy wildlife and Dr. Grey believes they have no effect on wildlife.

Dr. White’s hypothesis focuses on habitat destruction, and Dr. Grey’s hypothesis emphasizes the potential benefits of urban environments.

Dr. White and Dr. Grey agree on the impacts of urbanization, stating it equally affects wildlife in all urban settings.

Hint

Submitted3.7K

Correct2.2K

% Correct60%