Contrasting Views on Biodiversity in Urban Settings

Passage 1 discusses the impact of urbanization on biodiversity in modern cities. The author argues that despite the negative effects of concrete landscapes and habitat fragmentation, urban areas can foster unique ecological interactions and drive the adaptation of certain species. Urban parks and green roofs, according to the passage, provide critical habitats for wildlife and assist in the conservation of endangered species. The passage concludes that urban environments should be designed to promote biodiversity rather than suppress it.

Passage 2 takes a contrasting viewpoint, claiming that urbanization is fundamentally detrimental to wildlife. It emphasizes the loss of natural habitats and fragmentation of ecosystems as critical threats to species survival. The author highlights research indicating that many species cannot adapt to urbanized environments due to increased human activity and pollution. The passage ends with a call for more stringent urban planning regulations aimed at preserving natural areas and protecting wildlife from the encroachment of urban development.