Critique the Principal's Argument on Extracurricular Funding

In a recent study, researchers found that students who regularly participated in extracurricular activities had higher average GPAs than those who did not engage in such activities. Based on this finding, the school's principal argues that increasing funding for extracurricular programs will lead to improved academic performance among students.

However, the principal's conclusion rests on a questionable assumption. The principal fails to consider that students with higher GPAs may be more likely to participate in extracurricular activities, rather than the activities directly influencing their academic performance. Additionally, the study does not address other potential factors that could contribute to the observed relationship, such as students' socioeconomic status or parental involvement.

Write a critique of the principal's argument. In your critique, be sure to analyze the logical reasoning underlying the argument and address any assumptions or flaws you identify. Support your critique with specific evidence and examples.