Read the following passage:
Amidst the tumult of discourse surrounding artificial intelligence, a fundamental shift is emerging in the way society perceives cognition. Historically viewed as a distinctly human trait, the capacity for complex thought and reasoning is now being re-evaluated. Researchers in cognitive science are beginning to acknowledge the potential for non-human entities, including machines, to exhibit forms of intelligence that challenge traditional definitions. This evolving landscape raises critical questions about what it means to 'think' and invites a reconsideration of the moral and ethical implications of intelligent design.
In a recent symposium, experts debated the criteria for intelligence. Dr. Amelia Chen posited that emotional responsiveness and adaptive learning should be included in the definition, while Dr. Marco Reyes argued for a more rigid framework based solely on logic and problem-solving capabilities. The discourse highlighted a divide between those who advocate for a broader understanding of intelligence, encompassing emotional and social dimensions, and those who favor a traditionalist view.