Debate on GMOs: Dr. Lee vs Dr. Garcia

Hard Conflicting Viewpoints Analyzing Arguments

In a debate on the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on agriculture, two scientists present opposing viewpoints. Dr. Lee supports the use of GMOs, arguing that they can lead to increased crop productivity and reduce the need for chemical pesticides. Conversely, Dr. Garcia contends that GMOs may have long-term negative effects on biodiversity and ecosystem health, suggesting that the potential benefits do not outweigh these risks.

Based on the arguments presented by both scientists, which conclusion can be drawn?

Dr. Lee's argument is more credible because it emphasizes productivity and pest reduction.

Dr. Garcia's argument is more valid because it addresses long-term ecological implications.

Both arguments are equally valid as they present different aspects of the issue.

Dr. Lee's claim about GMOs is flawed because it ignores consumer health concerns.

Hint

Submitted2.0K

Correct1.8K

% Correct90%