Disagreement on Personal Experience in Moral Philosophy

Hard Point At Issue Identify Disagreement

Two philosophers, Jane and Mark, are debating the importance of personal experience in shaping one's understanding of moral philosophy. Jane argues that personal experience is essential because it provides individuals with insights that cannot be accessed through theoretical study alone. She believes that without these experiences, one's moral reasoning remains shallow and disconnected from reality. Mark counters that moral philosophy must be grounded in objective principles that are universal and independent of individual experiences. He asserts that relying too heavily on personal experience can lead to subjective interpretations that may distort moral reasoning.

As they continue their discussion, Jane emphasizes that personal experience enriches philosophical discourse and should be acknowledged as a valid source of knowledge. In contrast, Mark insists that philosophical inquiry should remain objective, valuing universal truths over personal narratives.

Based on this exchange, what is the main point at issue between Jane and Mark?

Whether personal experience can influence moral reasoning.

Whether theoretical study is more important than personal experience.

Whether moral philosophy should be based on universal principles.

Whether all individuals interpret moral situations similarly.

Whether personal experience can provide valid insights into moral philosophy.

Hint

Submitted1.5K

Correct1.3K

% Correct90%