Evaluating Sustainable Agriculture Argument

Hard Critical Reasoning Evaluating Arguments

In a recent discussion on sustainable agriculture, a prominent agronomist stated, "Farmers who shift to organic farming techniques will not only reduce their dependency on chemical fertilizers but also improve the long-term health of their soil." This statement has sparked debate about the practical implications of organic farming methods.

Critics argue that while the long-term benefits of organic farming are clear, the transition phase can lead to decreased crop yields, which may jeopardize the immediate financial stability of farmers relying on conventional methods. Proponents insist that with proper training and resources, farmers can successfully navigate this transition without suffering significant losses.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the agronomist's argument?

Farmers who previously switched to organic practices reported an overall increase in their financial stability after adjusting.

Chemical fertilizers have been proven to degrade the quality of soil over time if used continuously.

During the transition to organic farming, farmers can experience initial crop losses due to a lack of immediate chemical aids.

Organic farming techniques can improve crop resilience to pests, resulting in better yields in the long term.

Hint

Submitted1.4K

Correct1.3K

% Correct93%