Evaluating Zoo Revenue Arguments

Very Hard Critical Reasoning Evaluating Arguments

The board of a local zoo recently stated that introducing a new species of animals would increase visitor attendance and boost revenues. They base this on historical data indicating that zoos with diverse animal exhibits tend to attract more visitors. However, a group of animal welfare advocates argues that introducing new species could harm the existing ecosystem within the zoo and potentially stress the animals already present.

In evaluating the board's argument, which of the following would most seriously weaken their conclusion that introducing a new species will boost revenues?

Many visitors prefer zoos that focus on conservation and the well-being of existing animals rather than introducing new species.

Past attendance records show that new species often temporarily increase visitor numbers but do not lead to lasting revenue boosts.

The zoo can increase revenue through enhancements to the current habitats without introducing new species.

Studies indicate that visitor satisfaction primarily depends on the quality of existing animal care, not the number of different species.

Hint

Submitted1.7K

Correct1.5K

% Correct87%