The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has played a crucial role in the interpretation of the Constitution, often making landmark decisions that shape American law and society. In this prompt, you will compare the Court’s reasoning in two landmark cases: Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).
In your response, you must analyze how the reasoning employed in each case reflects differing views on equality under the law and the role of precedent in constitutional interpretation. Discuss the rationale of the Court in both cases, noting the significance of their decisions in the context of civil rights and liberties.
Your analysis should include specific quotes from the majority opinions, key constitutional principles, and the broader implications of each ruling.
Note: The provided solution includes an example of a perfect-score answer and explanation. Your response will not be scored.