Identify the Flaw in Environmental Argument

Very Hard Flaw In The Reasoning Identify Logical Flaw

In a recent debate about environmental conservation, a panel of experts presented the following argument:

Human activities are predominantly responsible for the degradation of natural habitats. Therefore, if we do not implement stricter regulations on industries such as logging and mining, we will inevitably face extinction of numerous plant and animal species. The only way to ensure the survival of these species is to enact immediate legislation that limits industrial expansion in ecologically sensitive areas.

Which of the following identifies a flaw in the reasoning of the argument above?

The argument relies solely on emotional appeals to persuade the audience.

It assumes that only industrial activities contribute to habitat degradation.

The conclusion erroneously generalizes about the fate of all species based on human actions.

It does not consider alternative means of protecting species beyond legislation.

The argument fails to quantify the impact of current regulations on species survival.

Hint

Submitted10.2K

Correct8.1K

% Correct80%