Consequences of the Citizens United Ruling

Hard Unit 5: Political Participation Campaign Finance

In the context of campaign finance, the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) significantly altered the landscape of political funding. The ruling led to the conclusion that limiting independent spending by corporations and unions infringes on free speech protections under the First Amendment. This case has had profound implications for how political campaigns are financed and has raised concerns regarding the influence of money in politics.

Which of the following outcomes is a direct consequence of the Citizens United ruling?

Increased restrictions on the amount of money individuals can donate to political campaigns.

The prohibition of corporate money in all forms of political advertising.

A rise in the establishment and influence of Super PACs (Political Action Committees).

The requirement for candidates to disclose all campaign contributions publicly.

Hint

Submitted4.1K

Correct3.6K

% Correct88%