Texas v. Johnson: Protection of Symbolic Speech

Hard Unit 3: Civil Liberties & Rights Freedom Of Speech

In determining the scope of protection for freedom of speech under the First Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court has established several key precedents. One of the critical decisions came in the case of Texas v. Johnson (1989), where the defendant was prosecuted for burning an American flag as a means of political protest. The Court ruled that flag burning is a form of expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment.

Consider the implications of this ruling on the regulation of symbolic speech. Which of the following statements BEST captures the essence of the Court's ruling in Texas v. Johnson regarding freedom of speech?

Symbolic speech, such as flag burning, is not protected under the First Amendment.

The government can prohibit symbolic speech if it incites imminent lawless action.

Expression that is offensive or controversial is fully protected by the First Amendment.

Expressive conduct is only protected when it serves a political purpose.

Hint

Submitted761

Correct551

% Correct72%