Understanding Free Speech Through Brandenburg v. Ohio

Hard Unit 3: Civil Liberties & Rights Freedom Of Speech

The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. Over the years, the Supreme Court has addressed various limitations on freedom of speech, balancing societal interests with individual rights. One notable case that redefined the boundaries of free speech is Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), which expanded protections against government restrictions on speech. Amidst ongoing debates about hate speech and its implications on public safety, the Court has often revisited the principles set forth in this landmark case.

Considering this context, which of the following statements accurately reflects the current legal landscape of freedom of speech in the United States as established by the principles set in Brandenburg v. Ohio?

The government can restrict speech if it is intended to incite imminent lawless action.

All forms of hate speech are completely unprotected under the First Amendment.

Political speech is less protected than commercial speech under current standards.

Speech that poses a threat to public safety is protected unless it specifically incites violence.

Hint

Submitted11.8K

Correct6.6K

% Correct56%