In the field of cognitive psychology, researchers have long debated the nature of memory, particularly its reliability and reconstructive qualities. Recent studies have focused on the phenomenon known as the 'misinformation effect,' where a person's memory of an event can be altered by misleading information presented afterwards. For instance, when individuals were exposed to different versions of an event, those who received post-event misinformation tended to recall details that supported the misleading narrative. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the degree of suggestion often correlates with the confidence individuals express in their memories, despite the inaccuracies. Notably, this raises intriguing questions about the implications for eyewitness testimony, which often relies heavily on the perceived accuracy of recollection. As the legal system increasingly incorporates psychological insights, understanding the factors influencing memory distortion becomes crucial for legal outcomes.