Understanding the Outcome of Miranda v. Arizona

Medium Unit 3: Civil Liberties & Rights Landmark Supreme Court Cases

The landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966) significantly altered the landscape of law enforcement and the rights of individuals in the United States. In this case, Ernesto Miranda confessed to crimes after being interrogated by police without being informed of his rights to counsel and against self-incrimination. This decision led to the creation of what are commonly known as "Miranda Rights."

Which of the following statements best captures the primary outcome of the Miranda v. Arizona decision?

Police must inform suspects of their rights upon arrest.

Suspects cannot be held for more than 24 hours without charge.

Confessions obtained without counsel present are always inadmissible.

Individuals have the right to refuse a breathalyzer test during traffic stops.

Hint

Submitted3.6K

Correct2.7K

% Correct74%