Weakening the Argument on Carbon Emissions

Very Hard Weaken Undermine Argument

In a recent discussion among climate scientists, it was concluded that reducing carbon emissions is the most effective way to combat global warming. They cited a study indicating that countries which implemented strict emission regulations experienced a significant decrease in average temperatures over a decade. However, a rebuttal from a group of industrial economists claimed that while emissions reduction is noble, it negatively impacts economic growth, leading to higher unemployment rates. This rebuttal was met with skepticism by the climate scientists, who argue that economic growth should not outweigh environmental sustainability.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the climate scientists' argument that reducing carbon emissions is the most effective way to combat global warming?

Many countries that reduced emissions saw only marginal changes in temperature, suggesting other factors might be at play.

Implementation of emission regulations often receives wide public support, indicating awareness of climate change.

Industrial growth in some countries correlates with increased emissions, but there are exceptions.

Countries that prioritize emission reductions also invest heavily in green technology, further promoting economic stability.

There is a growing body of research indicating that addressing climate change through adaptation strategies can be more effective.

Hint

Submitted1.9K

Correct1.7K

% Correct88%