Evaluating Competing Arguments on Social Media

Very Hard Synthesis Of Information Evaluating Arguments

In a recent debate regarding the impact of social media on society, two speakers presented contrasting arguments. The first speaker claimed that social media enhances communication and facilitates community building, citing studies that show increased connectivity and support among users. The second speaker countered this viewpoint by arguing that social media contributes to misinformation and social fragmentation, referencing research that links social media use to increased polarization and reduced face-to-face interactions. Both speakers provided anecdotal evidence and data to support their claims, leading to a contentious discussion on the overall effects of social media.

Considering the arguments presented, evaluate the strength of each speaker's claims, as well as the supporting evidence they provided. Which option best identifies the main shortcoming in one of the arguments while demonstrating an understanding of evaluating competing viewpoints?

The first speaker fails to acknowledge the potential for misinformation on social media, making their argument less convincing.

The second speaker does not consider the positive aspects of social media, such as community support systems.

The first speaker overly relies on anecdotal evidence, which may not represent larger trends in social media use.

Both speakers provide valid points, but lack empirical evidence to thoroughly support their claims.

The second speaker's argument is undermined by their failure to recognize social media as a tool for social justice.

Hint

Submitted8.9K

Correct7.9K

% Correct89%