Analyzing Arguments on Digital vs. Traditional Research

Read the following argument:

In the age of digital information, a faction of educators argues that reliance on online resources for research undermines students' critical thinking skills. They claim that the ease of access to information leads to superficial understanding, as learners may not engage deeply with the material. In contrast, these educators advocate for a return to traditional research methods, highlighting that engaging with printed texts fosters a more rigorous analytical process. However, proponents of digital research argue that the sheer volume of accessible information equips students with a broader perspective, enhancing their ability to synthesize diverse viewpoints and develop informed arguments. They emphasize that digital literacy is a crucial skill in modern education that must be cultivated alongside traditional methods.