Evaluating Actions Against Environmental Principles

In a recent study on environmental ethics, researchers concluded that actions which lead to the degradation of the planet's ecosystems are inherently morally questionable. They proposed the principle that all human activities should be evaluated against their impact on environmental sustainability.

Using this principle, we can evaluate the following scenarios:

1. A company that manufactures single-use plastics argues that their products are convenient and that consumers desire them, thus they are justified in continuing production despite environmental concerns.

2. An individual chooses to drive a gas-guzzling SUV rather than a fuel-efficient vehicle, claiming comfort as the primary reason for their choice.

3. A community chooses to promote sustainable public transportation options, recognizing that reducing reliance on personal vehicles will help mitigate climate change.

4. A farmer decides to use synthetic fertilizers, arguing that it increases crop yield and is critical for meeting food demand.

5. An organization initiates a campaign to reduce plastic use and promote biodegradable alternatives, advocating for a shift in consumer behavior toward sustainability.

Which of the following actions best exemplifies adherence to the principle proposed in the study?